Prime Minister Narendra Modi should appoint a defence minister โ a full-time one โ and demonstrate a great deal of administrative acumen and political will if he is serious about his declared intent to strengthen Indiaโs national security and defence preparedness. Indeed, the absence of a full-time defence minister is merely symptomatic of a larger set of serious structural problems being faced by the countryโs higher defence management today, which is in urgent need of innovative reforms and radical restructuring. Mr. Modiโs address to the Combined Commanders Conference in New Delhi on October 17 found no mention of structural reforms in higher defence management whereas his predecessor did mention it from time to time even though the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government had sidestepped implementing the crucial reforms.
The disturbing reality today is that in the absence of a full-time defence minister and by not introducing defence reforms, it is the civilian bureaucracy โ having generalist IAS officers whose expertise in defence matters is questionable โ that has a major say in the countryโs defence planning and decision-making. This needs to change.
Committee recommendations
The demand for reforms in Indiaโs higher defence management is a long-standing one and has grown in strength ever since the Kargil Review Committee (KRC) recommended a number of reforms. In 2000, the then National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government appointed a Group of Ministers (GoM), with four task forces on intelligence reforms, internal security, border management, and higher defence management, to review the countryโs defence preparedness in the light of the KRCโs recommendations. Many of the recommendations made by the GoM were only partially implemented. And the most important one, of creating the post of Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), was ignored.
As a result, it has been widely perceived over the past decade or so that the countryโs defence sector needs further restructuring. In response, the UPA government appointed a task force on national security under the chairmanship of Mr. Naresh Chandra in 2011; it submitted its report a year later. Although classified, some of its content has been leaked to the press. Many of its recommendations were not to the liking of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the Defence Minister. As a result, the UPA government lost an opportunity to introduce crucial reforms. The report was to have been taken up by the Cabinet Committee on Security in February this year โ after the government sat on it for no less than one-and-a-half years, but it was too late by then as the UPA government felt that it should not take key national security decisions in its final days in office. Itโs now the turn of the NDA government to act.
Key issues
Building expertise
Standing committee reports
Read more at The Hindu – Civilian Supremacy and Defence Reforms
Stay connected with us via Facebook, Google+ or Email Subscription.
Subscribe to Central Government Employee News & Tools by Email [Click Here]
Follow us: Twitter [click here] | Facebook [click here] | Google+ [click here]
Admin
COMMENTS