1. Union of India, Through Secretary, Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, North Block, Raisina Hills, New Delhi
2. Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension Through The Secretary, Department of Pension and Pensioner’s Welfare Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi
3. Ministry of Railways Through Chairman, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi
4. Railway Board, Through Secretary, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi
For the Petitioner : Mr. M.M.P. Sinha (In Person)
For the Railways : Mr. D.K. Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Anil Singh.
For the Union of India : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.S.G.
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH)
We have heard learned counsel for the writ petitioner, who appears in person, and learned counsel for the Union of India as well as Railways.
discrepancy i.e. capable of happening and also happening. In fact, he submits that this is a clear case of impermissible discrimination and is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
This writ petition is, accordingly, allowed.
Click here to get the web copy of the Judgement
Stay connected with us via Facebook, Google+ or Email Subscription.