HomeNews

Denying child-care leave: Bombay High Court shocked by Airports Authority of India’s attitude

Bombay High Court shocked by Airports Authority of India's attitude in denying child-care leave By PTI | 22 Apr, 2014 The court was hearing a petitio

Child Care Leave to single male Defence Industrial employees: MoD Order
7th CPC Implementation – CCS Leave Rules 1972 Amendments – EL Rules in Vacation Deptt, HPL Rules, CCL for Female & Single Male Govt Servant, WRIL & Injury Leave
Central govt women employees fight for 730-day child care leave

Bombay High Court shocked by Airports Authority of India’s attitude in denying child-care leave
By PTI | 22 Apr, 2014

The court was hearing a petition filed by S Mangala, Deputy General Manager (Aviation Safety), AAI, seeking implementation of child care leave norms recommended in the Sixth Pay Commission in 2008.The court was hearing a petition filed by S Mangala, Deputy General Manager (Aviation Safety), AAI, seeking implementation of child care leave norms recommended in the Sixth Pay Commission in 2008.

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court pulled up the Airports Authority of India (AAI) for not considering the plea of a woman employee who had sought child-care leave as prescribed by the government norms, to take care of her daughter who suffers from learning disability.
“We are surprised at the adversarial stand of the AAI ….We are shocked by the attitude of the AAI. As an employer you should have taken a sympathetic approach,” said the division bench of Justices V M Kanade and Anil Memon.
The court was hearing a petition filed by S Mangala, Deputy General Manager (Aviation Safety), AAI, seeking implementation of child care leave norms recommended in the Sixth Pay Commission in 2008.

The Judges reserved the order after hearing both sides. Mangala approached the High Court after her request for leave for attending to her 12-year-old daughter was rejected.
Ajay Khaire, AAI’s counsel, argued its policy did not cover the child care leave. “We have increased the maternity leave from 135 days to 180 days. But, there is no provision of child care leave,” said Khaire.
Ravi Shetty, counsel for the Ministry of Civil Aviation, submitted that several public sector undertakings have their own policy and they do not follow the Centre’s guidelines.
But the HC felt that AAI should have been more considerate. “It is a genuine request. Her child has special needs. Is it not the duty of the employer to be considerate?” asked Justice Kanade.
AAI has initiated disciplinary action against the petitioner for going on leave without approval. Unhappy with this, Justice Kanade remarked, “She is seeking leave for her child. Is it a crime? She went on leave for what purpose? See the context.”

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com

Stay connected with us via Facebook, Google+ or Email Subscription.

Subscribe to Central Government Employee News & Tools by Email [Click Here]
Follow us: Twitter [click here] | Facebook [click here] Google+ [click here]
Admin

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 0